Oct 05, 2015

Vanderbilt University’s study of Tennessee’s Voluntary Preschool Program evaluates a low quality early childhood program using a flawed methodology. Randomization was corrupted by noncompliance with the intended experimental protocol. The press release accompanying the report exaggerates the importance of the findings and the quality of the evidence.   


Many students assigned to treatment refused to cooperate and the  investigators were forced to use the very same non-experimental methods that they fault other studies for using. Their claim of program effect fadeout is a consequence of the control group catching up, not a decline in performance in the treated.


The real lesson from the program is that you get what you pay for, and Tennessee did not put much into its program. Low quality programs produce weak and even sometimes harmful results.


This study does not refute the strong evidence that high quality preschool programs—criticized by the authors as “too expensive”—more than pay for themselves in terms of ROI. 

| Link |
by James J. Heckman  |  Jun 22, 2015
A recent study, Early Childhood Education by MOOC: Lessons from Sesame Street by Melissa Kearney and Phillip Levine, has been generating interest and, unfortunately, generalized comparisons with other early childhood programs. As noted by the...
by Heckman Equation  |  Apr 29, 2015
    Last week at the Education Writers Association’s 68th National Seminar in Chicago, Professor Heckman outlined a path forward for boosting social, health and economic outcomes and creating a more equitable society...
by Heckman Equation  |  Apr 16, 2015
  This week we thought we’d offer a rare peek behind the scenes at Professor Heckman’s research center. We recently visited the Center for the Economics of Human Development (CEHD), located on the south side of the...
by Heckman Equation  |  Mar 24, 2015
On March 23, Professor Heckman gave the keynote address at the 7th Annual Early Learning Water Cooler Conference in Sacramento. The event, hosted by the Advancement Project and co-sponsored by the California Department of Education, brought...
by James J. Heckman  |  Feb 09, 2015
The following op-ed first appeared in Roll Call on February 9, 2015.   As Congress debates the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act — commonly known as No Child Left Behind—...
by Heckman Equation  |  Jan 21, 2015
  If you watched the State of the Union address, you know that improving the economy, strengthening the middle class and reducing the deficit are national priorities.   Solving these challenges starts with investing...
Investing in quality early childhood development for disadvantaged children from birth through age 5 will help prevent achievement deficits and produce better education, health, social and economic outcomes. Such investments will reduce the need for costly remediation and social spending while increasing the value, productivity and earning potential of individuals. In fact, every dollar invested in quality early childhood development for disadvantaged children produces a 7 percent to 10 percent return, per child, per year.
- Professor James Heckman